Friday, 13 November 2026

The Other Cipher (Soli Hansen Mysteries Book 2) by Heidi Eljarbo



The Other Cipher
(Soli Hansen Mysteries Book 2) 
By Heidi Eljarbo 


Publication Date: 2nd December 2020
Publisher: Independently Published
Page Length: 200 Pages
Genre: Historical Mystery

In the captivating second book of the Soli Hansen Mysteries, two women—separated by more than three hundred years—are connected through their love of art.

1613. Fabiola Ruber is been wed to a man she does not know and must live in a country with a new language and different customs. The memories of a lost love in her hometown Malta haunt her, and she sets out to find an artist who can do her portrait and recapture the feelings she had when she once modeled for a renowned Italian master painter.

1944. Four years into World War II, art historian Soli Hansen works with the Norwegian resistance to locate significant artwork and safeguard the pieces from the Nazis. When she finds out the Germans are after a hidden baroque depiction of a seventeenth century woman, she must muster all her courage and skills to decipher encrypted codes and preserve the mysterious art before it’s too late.

Both women are determined to do what they can to bring healing and redemption to their otherwise ominous future. Through tangled, bewildering clues and an eye for detail, Soli’s bond to Fabiola grows closer by the day. She must find the missing painting before the enemy does.

Ranging from a privileged life in seventeenth century Antwerp to Oslo during the German occupation of the second world war, this dual timeline is a historical mystery thriller that will keep you guessing until the very end.


Pick up your copy of The Other Cipher HERE

 

Heidi Eljarbo



HEIDI ELJARBO grew up in a home full of books, artwork, and happy creativity. She is the author of historical novels filled with courage, hope, mystery, adventure, and sweet romance during challenging times. She’s been named a master of dual timelines and often writes about strong-willed women of past centuries.


After living in Canada, six US states, Japan, Switzerland, and Austria, Heidi now calls Norway home. She lives with her husband on a charming island and enjoys walking in any kind of weather, hugging her grandchildren, and has a passion for art and history.


Her family’s chosen retreat is a mountain cabin, where they hike in the summer and ski the vast white terrain during winter.


Heidi’s favorites are her family, God's beautiful nature, and the word whimsical.


Sign up for her newsletter at https://www.heidieljarbo.com/newsletter! 


Connect with Heidi Eljarbo:

Website

Twitter

 Facebook

Instagram

Pinterest

BookBub

Amazon Author Page

Goodreads



Author Interview with Nancy Jardine




Today, I am delighted to welcome Nancy Jardine back to Yarde Book Promotions to talk about After Whorl: Donning Double Cloaks, another instalment in her Celtic Fervour series.

Set in AD 79, the novel takes readers further north into Caledonia, where the Roman legions under General Agricola are continuing their advance into territories determined to resist imperial rule. For Bran, once known as Brennus of the Garrigill Clan, the struggle against Rome has become increasingly complicated. Far from his former home, he must work with unfamiliar tribes, gather intelligence and find new ways to challenge an enemy whose military strength and organisation seem almost impossible to overcome.

Meanwhile, Ineda remains enslaved to the Roman tribune Valerius, travelling north with the advancing army while secretly gathering information for those resisting Roman occupation. With her own safety and that of her child at stake, every decision carries considerable danger.

Nancy joins me today to talk about the historical research behind Agricola's campaigns in Caledonia, the challenges of following Bran and Ineda's separate journeys, and the difficult choices facing the northern tribes as Roman expansion threatens their independence and way of life.



Publication Date: 19th April 2018
Publisher: Nancy Jardine
Page Length: 294 Pages
Genre: Historical Romance

An arduous trek to barbarian territory. Poignant loss. Devastating battlegrounds.

AD 79 The punitive chaos begins…

Bran monitors Roman legion activity, across his home territory, till General Agricola orders complete conquest of the barbarians of the far north of Britannia. Determined to stop the Roman invasions, Bran sets forth to find the Caledonian chief who will lead all of the northern tribes in battle against the Roman Empire. Danger sits on his shoulder, yet he manages to keep one step ahead of General Agricola.

Ineda journeys to Caledonia with her master, Tribune Valerius, a supplies officer for General Agricola’s Caledonian campaign. At Pinnata Castra Fortress disaster strikes! Determined to have a future free from enslavement, Ineda escapes and joins fellow rebels who congregate in the far north.

The Legions of the Roman Empire and the Caledonian Allies clash in battle… but where are Brennus and Ineda?

The adventures of the Garrigill Clan continue…




After Whorl: Donning Double Cloaks moves the story forward to AD 79 and the campaigns associated with General Agricola. What made this new phase of Rome's advance into northern Britannia particularly exciting for you to explore?

From the very concept of the series, I was desperate to have ‘Romans against Local Caledon’ action right on my doorstep in Aberdeenshire. After Whorl: Donning Double Cloaks covers some of the known Roman activity in southern and central Scotland, and then as far northwards to the area known as the Garioch, north-west of current Aberdeen. When I wrote the scenes towards the end of the novel, where there is direct confrontation in battle nine miles from where I live, it was tremendously exciting.


Bran has progressed from resisting Roman occupation within his own territory to monitoring legionary movements and seeking a Caledonian leader capable of uniting the northern tribes. How has his understanding of resistance changed since we first encountered him as Brennus?

After Brennus (as Bran) makes the move northwards into Caledonia, he realises that large swathes of territory harbour fewer people than would have been found in parts of Brigantia. This means that journeying to the smaller Caledonian settlements is a slower process. Caledonia is much more mountainous, with difficult terrain for the Roman legions to patrol and subdue, but that also means communications amongst resisting iron-age warriors also takes time. For Bran that means accepting that guerilla-type warfare is much more successful, and that any intelligence gathering has to be more rigidly organised and controlled by Caledon allies. Strategies of resistance have to be revised. I also saw Bran as taking on board that he could contribute to the resistance forces as a highly effective cog in a very large wheel, covering an extensive territory.


The title Donning Double Cloaks immediately suggests hidden identities and divided loyalties. What does the idea of wearing a 'double cloak' represent within Bran and Ineda's world?

The ‘hidden cloak’ for Brennus is being known as Bran of the resistance and not his former self as Brennus of the Garrigill hillfort. To be successful as Bran, he has to suppress any temptations of going back to his old life as a Garrigill warrior. As Bran, he makes a new life with Lleia believing that Ineda is lost to him, though he never forgets the courageous and stimulating Ineda. However, suppressing his former identity doesn’t mean he doesn’t want to know about the fate of his family, because he definitely does.

After Ineda is enslaved by Tribune Valerius, she pretends she is inured to her new role in life and accepting of it. However, her fierce loyalty to her tribal identity means she dons the cloak of subterfuge at great risk to herself, to spy and send back useful information about Roman movements in northern Britannia, and then in Caledonia. The double life she is living takes a toll on her determination to continue, and the torment is compounded by her need to protect her half-Roman offspring. Had Tribune Valerius not been the honourable man that he actually is, her decisions to play her small part in Roman resistance might well have come more easily to her. For Ineda, there’s a tiny little bit of the Stockholm Syndrome in play but not quite enough for her to be completely enthralled by Valerius.


Bran's journey takes him into the territories of peoples the Romans regarded as barbarians. How did you approach imagining the different northern tribes and the political difficulties involved in persuading them to unite against a common enemy?

The Romans called any unconquered tribes barbarians – as in beyond their control. The greatest difficulty for me, at that point in the writing of the whole series, was what to call the tribes that General Agricola’s forces confront in Caledonia, during the period of roughly AD 77-84. Since I didn’t want to invent tribal names, and thus produce more of a fantasy novel, I used Claudius Ptolemaeus’ names for the tribes of Caledonia – even though it was many decades later before ‘Ptolemy’ (c AD 100 -170) made a record of those names. (It’s unknown if Ptolemy got his names from Agricolan sources.)

The landscape of Caledonia plays greatly into how ancient tribes would have controlled their own territory. However, by AD 77, roughly when General Agricola first marched his troops into Caledonia, Roman legions had been occupying parts of southern Britannia for more than three decades. By AD 77, the tribes of Caledonia would have had plenty of knowledge of the Roman Legions and what they were capable of – even if the tribes of the north lacked the actual experience of confronting the Roman fighting machine. Though immediate communication was lacking at that time equestrian warriors were capable of carrying information over large distances fairly quickly. Some recent archaeologists believe that it may have been earlier Governors of Britannia who initially sent Roman forces into Caledonia e.g. Cerialis c. AD 69-71. If that was the case, then the Caledonian tribes would have known what was at stake.

In Donning Double Cloaks I saw the Caledonian tribes as fully realising that Agricola was intent on dominating all of them and they, therefore, needed to become stronger allies to survive in some way, or another.


Ineda remains enslaved to Tribune Valerius and travels north as part of Agricola's campaign before finally seeing an opportunity to escape. How has her experience of enslavement changed her since the events of the previous book?

Her natural desire to escape continues but that is tempered by the persistent caution she needs to employ to make it happen. To be caught in the act of spying would be a death sentence and, as a mother, she now has more than herself to consider. Over the years of her captivity, she has seen how the Roman legions operate from inside of their encampments, forts and fortresses. She has learned how rigidly the Romans control everything around them, including their own personnel inside a fort. It takes a dire calamity for her to realise that escape might actually be possible.


Valerius serves as a supplies officer, giving readers a perspective on Roman campaigning that goes beyond soldiers and battles. How important were logistics and supply networks to Agricola's ability to push Roman forces ever farther north?

The logistics and supply networks were unsurpassed, and were super-critical to the success of Roman armies in whichever territory they were claiming for the Empire. During Agricola’s campaigning in Caledonia it was just the same. An invading Roman legion never depended on what they might find in a territory. They always had to ensure that they could supply themselves with everything they needed before an advance, and until local supplies could be deemed to be reliable and plentiful. Entering hostile territory with thousands of Roman soldiers at a time meant feeding and watering a huge amount more than the locals they were attempting to dominate.


Pinnata Castra Fortress becomes a pivotal location in Ineda's story. What historical and archaeological evidence did you draw upon when recreating Roman forts and military activity during this period?

Some of the forts and fortresses in Caledonia are attributed to being part of the Caledonian Agricolan campaigns of roughly AD 77-84. I used what seemed to be the most conclusive evidence I could unearth, though actual excavations during the 20th Century were scant and were underfunded compared to modern ‘digs’. Since I wrote my Celtic Fervour Series, more excavations have been undertaken, though I’m pleased to say my choices still seem very reasonable. The name Pinnata Castra appears on one of Ptolemy’s Caledonian ‘maps’ though that is a misleading term since Ptolemy set down the co-ordinates of places rather than creating what we’d now call a map. I decided to use the name Pinnata Castra for my fortress, and set it in the same location as the archaeologically-identified huge supply fortress of Inchtuthil near Dunkeld, on the upper River Tay.


Bran is trying to remain ahead of Agricola while Ineda is travelling within the Roman campaign itself, placing them on very different sides of the advancing army. How did you manage these parallel storylines while maintaining the connection between two characters who are physically separated?

Getting the different timelines to intermingle correctly wasn’t easy. I pored over home-made maps all the time with screeds and screeds of dates on them which seemed to be the most appropriate to me for Agricolan troop movements. A spanner in the works is that actually dating Agricola’s Caledonian campaigns is very tricky. At that time in 1st Century AD, the Romans didn’t name a year as in 77, followed by 78, i.e. the way we do using the Gregorian Calendar system after the bells ring in the new year. 1st Century Roman dating systems relied heavily on using the consulships of a particular time and some ‘years’ had more than the usual amounts of consulships awarded. (Very confusing!)


The confrontation between the Roman legions and the Caledonian allies brings the competing cultures and military strategies into direct conflict. When the surviving evidence for events in northern Britannia is incomplete, how do you decide where historical probability ends and the novelist's imagination can begin?

I made a judgement to have my Agricola at the battlegrounds of Beinn na Ciche in AD 84. I can’t call my battle Mons Graupius, a name Tacitus named as a victorious battle for Agricola in northern Caledonia, since no huge battle ground has ever been identified. The current range of hills named Bennachie in Aberdeenshire tick many of the possible boxes for a place of battle, so I wrote in my battle as at Beinn na Ciche. One of the peaks currently named Mither Tap at Bennachie is easily seen across miles and miles of relatively low lying undulating land in all directions. For me, that was a reasonable beacon to draw the Caledon allies to the place of battle.

It’s also highly important to me that the identified temporary Roman camp at Durno, across the shallow valley from Mither Tap, is the largest identified temporary camp in Aberdeenshire. It’s possibly bigger than Agricola might have needed but since the true composition of his army is unknown, but if Agricola had more equestrian auxiliary units at his disposal for his Caledonian campaigns, then he would have needed more camp ground for a larger quota of horses. The actual facts are unknown, but it’s so exciting to try to work it all out!

As to novelist imagination, when I was researching some etymology relevant to the Bennachie Mither Tap area, I discovered that the language/ dialect the natives might have spoken 2000 years ago was a form of ancient Welsh (not the same basis as current Welsh). In one 1905 published tome, I discovered that the word Durno/ Duro had many meanings, including one which meant ‘many fists’. That was a light-bulb moment for me knowing that some farm field-names across Aberdeenshire have remained the same for centuries! The ‘many fists’ of that Durno field, opposite Mither Tap of Bennachie, found its way into my writing with no bother at all!


By this point in the Celtic Fervour series, readers have witnessed Roman expansion develop from an approaching threat into a sustained campaign deep into northern territory. What does Donning Double Cloaks reveal about the consequences of conquest for the Garrigill Clan that you hadn't been able to explore in the earlier novels?

The main decisions the members of the Garrigill clan have to make, over a period of years,  years are – Do they keep confronting the Roman enemy directly in their home surroundings, with a greater possibly of dying? Or, do they accept that becoming refugees means moving further and further northwards to find a place of safety where they can continue their religious and cultural lifestyles, and have the local support needed to continue with an aggressive resistance?

It’s documented that Agricola probably took seven summer-campaign seasons before his troops reached almost to the Moray Firth. The usual strategy for a campaigning legion was for the bulk of the soldiers to over-winter in places (forts) deemed to be safer and more easily guarded. This also meant leaving skeleton forces to guard already built defences: forts; fortlets and guard towers. Fewer Roman soldiers in situ over a winter season meant I could have Bran, and my Garrigill Clan, involved in some very strategic guerilla activity during the colder months and have them plan for future situations with local leaders. Bringing weather and seasonal conditions into the strategies wasn’t so necessary in the earlier novels.



A huge thank you to Nancy Jardine for joining me once again and sharing more about After Whorl: Donning Double Cloaks.


Pick up your copy of After Whorl Donning Double Cloaks HERE.
Read with #Kindle+

Nancy Jardine


Nancy Jardine lives in the spectacular ‘Castle Country’ of Aberdeenshire, Scotland. Her main writing focus has, to date, been historical and time travel fiction set in Roman Britain, though she’s also published contemporary mystery novels with genealogy plots. If not writing, researching (an unending obsession), reading or gardening, her young grandchildren will probably be entertaining her, or she’ll be binge-watching historical films and series made for TV. 

She loves signing/ selling her novels at local events and gives author presentations locally across Aberdeenshire. These are generally about her novels or with a focus on Ancient Roman Scotland, presented to groups large and small. Zoom sessions have been an entertaining alternative to presenting face-to-face events during, and since, the Covid 19 pandemic restrictions.

Current memberships are with the Historical Novel Society; Scottish Association of Writers; Federation of Writers Scotland, Romantic Novelists Association and the Alliance of Independent Authors. She’s self-published with the author co-operative Ocelot Press.

Connect with Nancy:





Thursday, 12 November 2026

Author Interview: Alison Morton



Today, I am delighted to welcome Alison Morton back to Yarde Book Promotions to talk about RETALIO, the concluding novel in Aurelia's story in the Roma Nova series.

Aurelia has spent her life defending the country she loves, serving as a soldier, Praetorian and political leader. But now, wounded, exiled and separated from Roma Nova, she finds herself facing perhaps her greatest challenge yet. Caius Tellus has seized power, her reputation has been undermined, and the people she once led are no longer certain they can trust her.

Far from home in Vienna during the early 1980s, Aurelia must somehow rebuild alliances, organise resistance and find a way to reclaim her country. Yet the struggle is not simply about defeating an enemy. With loyalties divided and the people she loves facing dangers of their own, Aurelia must decide how much she is prepared to sacrifice for the future of Roma Nova.

Alison joins me today to talk about Aurelia's most difficult journey, the challenges of writing resistance and political intrigue, and the personal relationships that give this final confrontation its emotional weight. We will also discover how Aurelia has changed throughout the series and what readers can look forward to as they explore more of the Roma Nova world.


But first, let's check out RETALIO



Publication Date: 27th April 2017
Publisher: Pulcheria Press
Print Length: 338 Pages
Genre: Alternative History / Thriller

Is resistance always futile?

Recovering from a near fatal shooting, Aurelia Mitela, former foreign minister of Roma Nova, rages at her enforced exile. She barely escaped from Caius Tellus, who grabbed power in her beloved homeland. Aurelia’s duty and passion fire her determination to liberate its people despite her lover Miklós's desire to protect her. Then Caius sends a hit squad to murder her...

Caius's manipulations isolated her from her fellow exiles, leaving her ostracised and powerless. But without their trust and support Aurelia knows she will never see her beloved Roma Nova again.

Part political thriller, part deadly personal rivalry, part military adventure, this is Roman fiction brought up to the 20th century and delivers noble ideals, passionate love, desperate choices, sacrifice, constant twists and turns and dialogue with a dash of humour in a timeline not so different from our own...




RETALIO finds Aurelia in perhaps her darkest situation yet – wounded, exiled and separated from the country she has devoted her life to serving. How did you approach writing a heroine whose greatest battle is as much emotional as it is physical?

Aurelia is a soldier, a former Praetorian and a politician. She's used to taking action, making decisions and being in control. At the beginning of the book, she feels frustrated and a failure. Looking at a character who’s normally capable, physically and mentally tough and stripping away almost everything she relies on can bring out the character’s inner resources. 

She has to deal with frustration, fear and the very human feeling of being powerless. And, perhaps hardest of all, she has to question whether the people she wants to lead still believe in her.

But being a blood-and-bone Roma Novan, Aurelia is not someone who gives up easily. Her determination is still there, although she has to dig deeper to find it. I hope readers see that courage isn't about never being frightened or vulnerable. It's about pushing on despite those feelings.


Exile is a powerful theme throughout the novel. What opportunities did Aurelia's forced separation from Roma Nova give you as a writer that wouldn't have been possible had she remained at home?

Exile gave me a wonderful opportunity to turn Aurelia's world upside down. Roma Nova is not just her home; it's her identity, her history and the place she has devoted her life to serving. Take her away from it and suddenly she's lost her natural environment and much of the authority she's always taken for granted.

There's also a delicious writerly opportunity in making her look at her own country from the outside. When you're at home, you know how things work, who to trust and where you belong. When you're an exile, all those assumptions disappear.

I also wanted to explore the practical difficulties of trying to organise resistance from abroad. It's all very well having a brilliant plan, but you need people, resources and, above all, trust. And Aurelia doesn't have much of any of those!

Added to the mix, we see Vienna in the early 1980s was a city with its own complicated history and atmosphere and a very different environment from Roma Nova. 


The title RETALIO suggests retaliation, but the story also explores forgiveness, loyalty and sacrifice. How do these seemingly opposing ideas shape Aurelia's journey?

Yes, RETALIO is about retaliation and the final reckoning between Aurelia and Caius Tellus, plays out, but it’s also about restoration. However, I didn't want it to be a simple case of one side being bad and the other good, followed by a satisfying bang at the end!

Aurelia has to decide what she's prepared to do to achieve her objective. How far can she go without becoming like the people she's fighting? And what does loyalty actually mean? Is it unquestioning obedience, or does it sometimes mean challenging someone because you believe they're wrong?

Forgiveness is perhaps the most difficult of all. Some things can be forgiven, others can't, and sometimes you have to put personal feelings aside for a greater purpose. Sometimes a dilemma in real life as well!

For Aurelia, the struggle is not simply about getting even. It's about restoring something worth having. She wants her country back, but she also wants its people to be free. There's a difference, and I think that's important.


Caius Tellus continues to cast a long shadow over Aurelia's life. How has their rivalry evolved since readers first encountered them, and what makes their conflict so enduring? 

Oh, Caius! He's one of those characters writers love writing, even though in real life I would probably cross the street to avoid meeting him.

He's charming, intelligent, manipulative and utterly ruthless. He's also Aurelia's opposite in some important respects. Both are determined, politically astute and capable of taking decisive action, but their values and what they want for Roma Nova are poles apart.

Their rivalry has developed over time from the first time we meet her in AURELIA from a personal and political contest into something much bigger. Caius has seized power, and Aurelia has become the person who represents the greatest threat to his regime. He understands her strengths, but he also knows where she's vulnerable.

What makes their conflict so enduring is that neither can simply walk away. For Aurelia, this is about her country and its people. For Caius, it's about retaining power. They are playing for very different stakes, and that makes the final confrontation particularly compelling.


Trust becomes a precious commodity as Aurelia struggles to win back the confidence of her fellow exiles. Why was it important to explore the challenges of rebuilding alliances during times of political upheaval?

Because resistance isn't a one-woman operation, however capable that woman might be! Aurelia has military experience, political knowledge and plenty of determination, but she can't liberate Roma Nova on her own.

Caius has been clever in isolating her and undermining her standing with the other exiles. That means she has to do something she finds particularly difficult – persuade people to trust her again.

But once trust is damaged, you can't simply issue an order and expect everyone to fall into line. People have their own fears, ambitions, loyalties and reasons for behaving as they do. Some have suffered, some have become disillusioned; others may have decided that keeping their heads down is the safest option.

I wanted to show that building a resistance movement is as much about understanding people and negotiating differences as it is about strategy, logistics and action. In fact, sometimes the conversations are more difficult than the battles!


Alongside the political intrigue and military action, RETALIO places considerable emphasis on Aurelia's relationship with Miklós. How important was it to show the personal cost of leadership and resistance through their relationship?

Very important. I don't think we can understand a character properly if we only see them in their professional role. Aurelia is a soldier and a political leader, but she's also a woman who loves and is loved.

Her relationship with Miklós gives us a different perspective on her. It shows the personal consequences of the choices she makes and the pressures she puts herself under. When you're fighting for something as enormous as the future of your country, it's easy to convince yourself that everything else must come second.

But those closest to you don't necessarily see things that way. They have their own hopes, fears and needs. And they have to live with the consequences of your decisions, too.

I wanted the relationship to have its own emotional weight, rather than simply provide a romantic interlude between bouts of political intrigue and gunfire. Love doesn't make the dangers disappear – it makes the stakes even higher, sometimes to heartbreak level. Be warned. ;-).


Your novels often combine action with moments of wit and humanity. How do you decide when to introduce lighter moments into stories that deal with danger, betrayal and loss?

I think humour is essential! Even in the most difficult circumstances, people make jokes, see the absurd side of things or find themselves in situations that are unintentionally funny.

In the military, I've experienced how humour often diffuses tension and stress. Nicknamed ‘gallows humour’, sometimes it's very dry, sometimes rather black and occasionally completely inappropriate. But not including it would be unrealistic.

I also find that if you keep the tension at maximum pitch for page after page, readers can become exhausted. A lighter moment gives them a chance to breathe before the next crisis arrives. (And in my books, there's usually another one waiting!)

Any humour has to arise naturally from the characters and the situation. Aurelia has a sharp mind and a certain amount of dry wit. I enjoy letting that side of her emerge, particularly when things are going badly.


Throughout the Roma Nova series, readers have watched Aurelia grow from soldier to diplomat, stateswoman and resistance leader. Looking back, which stage of her journey has been the most rewarding for you to write?

That's a difficult one! Each stage has its attractions, but I think writing Aurelia as a resistance leader in RETALIO has been particularly rewarding.

We first meet the younger Aurelia as someone with a strong military background and a very clear sense of duty. Over the course of her adventures, she has to develop new skills, understand different political environments and learn that being right isn't always enough to persuade other people.

By RETALIO, she's had to bring all those experiences together. She's no longer simply a soldier who can deal with a problem through action. She has to inspire people, negotiate, make compromises and sometimes accept that she can't control everything.

That's a fascinating journey for a writer because a character who has learned and changed is much more interesting than one who remains exactly the same from book to book.

And, of course, it's rather satisfying to bring the story of her younger years to its conclusion!


Resistance movements throughout history have often depended on ordinary people making extraordinary sacrifices. Were there any historical events or real-life figures that influenced the themes explored in RETALIO?

History is full of people who have had to make extraordinary decisions in very difficult circumstances. I've always been interested in what happens when individuals find themselves caught up in events much larger than themselves. Resistance to an authoritarian regime isn't confined to one period or one country.

I was particularly interested in the human side of resistance: how people organise themselves, how they communicate, whom they trust, and what they're prepared to risk. It's easy to admire resistance fighters in retrospect, when we know how events turned out. Much harder to imagine making those choices when the outcome is risky, often dangerous, even lethal.

I also wanted to avoid the idea that resistance is only the business of heroic individuals. Movements depend on all sorts of people, including those whose contributions seem small or may never be recognised. That collective effort, and the sacrifices behind it, are central to the story.


For readers reaching the end of Aurelia's adventures, what do you hope her story leaves them reflecting on – not only about courage and resilience, but also about the enduring value of hope in the face of overwhelming odds?

I hope readers come away feeling that determination and hope can make a real difference, even when the odds look pretty dreadful.

Aurelia is not invincible. She makes mistakes, gets hurt, loses people and sometimes finds herself in situations where she has very little control. But she keeps going because she believes in something bigger than herself.

Perhaps readers might like to reflect about leadership – a slippery concept. It's not simply about having authority or being the person who gives the orders. It's about responsibility, making difficult decisions and being prepared to put yourself on the line for others. 

And perhaps most importantly, I hope they enjoy the ride! I've spent a long time with Aurelia and the people of Roma Nova and there is something satisfying about seeing her face her greatest challenge and discovering whether all those years of experience, courage and sheer stubbornness will be enough.

As for Roma Nova itself, well, I hope readers will want to stay a little longer in its world! And be tempted to find out about her granddaughter Carina’s adventures – INCEPTIO, CARINA, PERFIDITAS and  SUCCESSIO – in the present or even the foundation story of Roma Nova in the 4th century in JULIA PRIMA and EXSILIUM.


A huge thank you to Alison Morton for joining me once again and sharing more about RETALIO and the conclusion of Aurelia's remarkable journey.


Pick up your copy of RETALIO HERE



Alison Morton



Alison Morton writes award-winning thrillers featuring tough but compassionate heroines. Her twelve-book Roma Nova series is set in an imaginary European country where a remnant of the Roman Empire has survived into the 21st century and is ruled by women who face conspiracy, revolution and heartache but use a sharp line in dialogue. 

She blends her fascination for Ancient Rome with six years’ military service and a life of reading crime, historical and thriller fiction. On the way, she collected a BA in modern languages and an MA in history.  

Alison lives in Poitou in France, the home of Mélisende, the heroine of her three contemporary thrillers, Double Identity, Double Pursuit and Double Stakes.

For the latest news, subscribe to her newsletter at https://www.alison-morton.com/newsletter/ and receive 'Welcome to Alison Morton’s Thriller Worlds' as a thank you gift.