Richard III
— Loyalty Binds Me
By Matthew
Lewis
Everyone knows about Richard III. Or at least,
they think they do. For many, Shakespeare’s portrayal represents the facts of Richard’s story, maybe with a little
embellishment, but it is generally about right. If anyone is any doubt, then
Sir Thomas More and Polydore Vergil amongst others are on hand to put them
straight. There are plenty of biographies of Richard III, so the question I had
to ask was whether there was room for another on the crowded bookshelves of
readers.
My hope is that this book will help to provide a more rounded
assessment of Richard than many others do. If anyone doesn’t already know or
hasn’t already guessed, I’m a Ricardian. There. I said it.
Oh,
you’re still reading. Excellent! Sorry.
There
are a lot of books that focus on a particular element of Richard III’s life,
mainly around 1483, the fate of his nephews, the Princes in the Tower, or the
Battle of Bosworth. Far less books try to place Richard’s entire life in the
context of the time in which he lived. This book is the longest I’ve ever written
(hopefully readers won’t feel it too much!). It’s 200,000 words and about half
of it concentrates on the years before 1483. I don’t think we can really hope
to understand the Richard who dealt with the crises of that year without
knowing the man who arrived in London that spring.
King Edward V and the Duke of York in the Tower of London by Paul Delaroche — Wikipedia. |
This
biography is undoubtedly positive, and unashamedly so, though the intention is
not to provide a whitewashed Richard to counter the dark legend of more
traditional history. Some of Richard’s plans, ideas and passions lay at the
heart of his downfall, but perhaps not for the reason many people think. The
last attempt to revise Richard’s historical reputation in a full biography was
made by Paul Murray Kendall in 1955. Almost every other account of his life has
clung stubbornly to the traditional image of a power-mad homicidal maniac who,
most conclude, murdered his nephews and stole the throne based on lies and
treachery. I think there is room for a fresh look at Richard’s life without all
of the centuries of accumulated grime and muck that clings to it.
Here’s
an example, which is not really directly about Richard, but which is typical of
the accepted versions of his story. On 13 June 1483, at an infamous meeting of
part of the Council, we are told that Richard has Lord Hastings arrested and
summarily beheaded. Thomas Stanley is arrested, some accounts claiming he was
injured or nearly killed in the scuffle. Thomas Rotherham, Archbishop of York
and John Morton, Bishop of Ely are also seized and imprisoned. There is an
interesting anomaly within this story in almost all of its later versions. If
we go back to the strictly contemporary writers of 1483, it is easy to pick
out.
Dominic
Mancini, a source which is vital but given far too much credence, noted that
Hastings was in fact killed in the Council chamber in the uproar of an
accusation of treason against him. He tells us that Rotherham and Morton were
arrested and several others were at the Tower at the time. A record of the
events of that day kept by an anonymous London citizen note that Hastings was
arrested and beheaded, Rotherham and Ely were arrested, and that Edward IV’s
former secretary Oliver King was also taken. The Crowland Chronicler, writing
his account up in 1486 but a witness to many of the vents, said that Hastings
was executed, and Rotherham and Morton arrested.
None
of these accounts place Thomas, Lord Stanley at the meeting in the Tower on 13
June 1483. In fact, he would walk in a place of honour at Richard III’s
coronation on 6 July. I strongly suspect that as this moment became viewed as
the point at which Richard decided to eliminate those who he feared would
openly support Edward V, Stanley wanted in on the action. He may have told
later writers that he was there, even that he was wounded trying to protect the
rights of Edward V. Stanley family ballads would soon portray Thomas as an
uncle and protector to Elizabeth of York, the sister of the Princes in the
Tower and queen to Henry VII. He positioned himself as a defender of the House
of York, at least as represented by Edward IV and his children.
I
suspect Stanley’s presence on 13 June 1483 is a later addition, probably of his
own devising. Those writing about it at or very close to the time unanimously
do not place him there. I think he embellished the event to show that he took
one for the team and tried all that he could to save Edward V. He was lucky to
escape with his head, but he was one of just four men arrested for being
perceived as too close to Edward V. In fact, he doesn’t appear to have been
arrested, or event to have been present. If he was, his position at the
coronation a few weeks later would seem odd.
Ultimately,
whether there is space on readers’ bookshelves for another Richard III book
remains to be seen, as does the willingness of those with a deeply entrenched
view to Richard to entertain any alteration to it. For me, it was a book I
really wanted to write and I story I believe deserves to be told.
Richard III — Loyalty Binds Me
King
Richard III remains one of the most controversial figures in British history.
Matthew Lewis’s new biography aims to become a definitive account by exploring
what is known of his childhood and the impacts it had on his personality and
view of the world. He would be cast into insecurity and exile only to become a
royal prince before his tenth birthday.
As Richard spends his teenage years under the watchful gaze
of his older brother, Edward IV, he is eventually placed in the household of
their cousin, the Earl of Warwick, remembered as the Kingmaker; but as the
relationship between a king and his most influential magnate breaks down,
Richard is compelled to make a choice when the House of York fractures. After another period in
exile, Richard returns to become the most powerful nobleman in England. The
work he involves himself in during the years that follow demonstrates a drive
and commitment but also a dangerous naïveté.
When
crisis hits
in 1483, it is to Richard that his older brother turns on his death bed. The events of 1483 remain
contentious and hotly debated, but by understanding the Richard who began that
year, it will become clearer what drove some of his actions and decisions.
Returning to primary sources and considering the evidence available, this new
life undoes the myths and presents a real man living in tumultuous times.
Matthew
Lewis
Matthew
Lewis was born and grew up in the West Midlands. Having obtained a law degree,
he currently lives in the beautiful Shropshire countryside with his wife and
children. History and writing have always been a passion of Matthew's, with particular interest in the Wars of the Roses
period. His first novel, Loyalty, was born of the joining of those passions.
What an intriguing book. One for the 'to-read' list! I wish you all the best with your launch!
ReplyDeleteI shall look forward to reading your book.
ReplyDelete