When History hits the small screen.
By Vivienne Brereton
Every
history lover has been there. You’ve read your favourite historical novel on a
certain period at least twice, every single reference book you can lay your
hands on, earned yourself a PhD from the Armchair of History. And now…you’ve
heard it’s coming to a TV opposite your very own armchair. You can’t wait. How
exciting! Little tidbits are released every so often to whet your appetite so
by the time the release date arrives, you’re positively drooling with anticipation.
You might even have gathered some fellow Armchair Professors to watch the Big
Event, providing them with sustenance to get them through the excitement. You
sit down to watch, booing as the last car advert drags on, vowing never to sit
in that hapless model ever again. Then the voice comes on saying XYZ is proud
to present. Your heart swells to twice its normal size as the credits roll….
The Tudors - Season 1 - Opening Intro
In
my case, the big wait was for The Tudors.
How I’d anticipated the series for months, read every article, hoping that it
would live up to all the hype. I’ll never forget the opening sequence of…an
assassination of the English Ambassador in the Ducal Palace of Urbino in 1518. What?!
Who? When? Where? The assassins were apparently agents of François I of France,
and the victim Henry VIII’s uncle. I sat there for the first few minutes in a
totally unfamiliar Tudor landscape, uncomprehending and confused. I’d been
expecting a shot of a sexy young Henry (Jonathan Rhys-Meyers) striding
athletically around his court in tight yellow leather boots, barking orders at
trembling courtiers while sending amorous glances in the direction of the simpering
ladies of his long-suffering wife, Katherine (Maria Doyle Kennedy). So who was
this unknown (dead) man lying on the floor of the Ducal Palace and how come I’d
never heard of an assassination in all my years as an Armchair Historian? He
certainly wasn’t Henry’s uncle, I knew that for sure.
Worse
was to come. It was later reported that to keep it simpler for a worldwide audience
(how patronising and insulting to overseas viewers), Henry’s two sisters,
Margaret and Mary had morphed into one. Henry also had a daughter called Mary
but that was considered far too difficult for some viewers to deal with. Roll
of eyes. Margaret, his older sister, married the dashing King James IV of
Scotland but didn’t make it to the final cut. From my own knowledge of
Margaret, and how jealous of Mary she was, she wouldn’t have been happy about
that. As a consolation prize, Margaret’s name was kept in the show but handed
over to her far more beautiful younger sister, Mary, who was Henry’s favourite.
This surviving sister, now newly renamed Margaret, romped into a forbidden
marriage with Henry’s best friend, Charles Brandon (Henry Cavill) which made for
some very torrid scenes. The new Margaret (the former Mary who actually married
the ageing King Louis XII of France) married a fictitious King of Portugal but
held a candle for Charles Brandon. Looking at the utterly gorgeous Henry Cavill
and knowing the charm of the womanizing Brandon, this was not a difficult
stretch of the imagination.
By
now, you get the picture, I’m sure. The point is does it matter if a series is
wildly inaccurate and sexed up for ratings? For me, the answer is a definitive NO!
The moment Jonathan Rhys Myers appeared on screen in all his swaggering glory
and panther-like menace, he totally owned the part of Henry. As did Natalie
Dormer as the alluring, mercurial, brilliant Anne Boleyn. What did it matter if
Henry was six foot two and Jonathan five foot nine. Both men (like Brandon) were
known for their exceptional good looks, worthy pin-ups of their time. Henry
only having one sister could be overlooked (my apologies to Queen Margaret); Jonathan
brought Henry to life in all his glory: a beautiful man, clever, sensitive, poetic
but slightly cruel, sexy, arrogant, warlike, sporty. A king of kings. To add a
little poignancy, in real life, Jonathan battled with his own demons after the
death of his beloved mother in Ireland. I’ve long believed that the death of
Henry’s mother, Elizabeth of York, when he was a very impressionable ten
probably altered his life forever and broke a part of him deep inside.
Natalie
Dormer totally nailed Anne. I liked reading that the actress brought a lot of
her own beliefs to her interpretation. This included Anne’s involvement in
religious reforms. By giving the part to a talented actress with both brains
and beauty who loved the period so much she was able to persuade head writer,
creator, and executive producer, Michael Hirst to change his interpretation, I
would say it was a very shrewd move indeed. An entire line-up of talented stars
made the production shine including Sam Neill as Wolsey, Nick Dunning as Thomas
Boleyn, James Fraine as Cromwell, and Joely Richardson as Catherine Parr.
Henry meets Ann Boleyn — The Tudors.
At
times, I couldn’t help disapproving of the way Hirst seemed on an ego trip,
rewriting history on a whim. It seemed a little dangerous considering many
people take away the truth from a TV series. Poor old Margaret Tudor, fated to
be erased from history five hundred years later, she would have had a right old
fit of Tudor temper.
As
a writer myself of a Tudor novel, I try and keep as close to the facts as I
possibly can because I feel fact is stranger than fiction. That era needed no
embellishment whatsoever! If I have to alter dates a little or invent a new
twist for a more interesting plotline, I have no problem with that. My series, The House of the Red Duke is a blend of
real and imaginary characters anyway, so my imagination is given free reign
where necessary.
Vikings : Season 5 - Opening Credits / Intro
After The
Tudors, Michael Hirst moved on The
Vikings. It would be interesting to hear the views of The Vikings superfans (of whom I know a fair few!). I mentioned The Tudors to Tony Riches, author of a
wonderful series on the lives of the Tudors. He, too, had a problem with the
Mary/Margaret combo and jokingly suggested they were trying to save money by
only using one actress. I also asked Brook Allen, award-winning author of The Antonius Trilogy for her thoughts on
Rome, another series I loved but
always wondered about its authenticity. For obvious reasons, she was unhappy
with the way they portrayed her beloved Mark Antony, even though James Purefoy
did a good job with the script. If The
Tudors and Jonathan Rhys-Myers captured the essence of Henry Tudor, she
didn’t like the very dark portrayal of her hero, giving him a made-up fetish
for licking women’s blood.
Thank
you, Mary Anne for letting me come on and talk about The Tudors, one of my favourite topics in any form at all, even on a
mug!
To
make it up to Margaret Tudor and restore her to her rightful place in history,
I would like to finish with an excerpt from Book One of The House of the Red Duke. A
Phoenix Rising. Here she is in November, 1512, firmly back in the picture,
with her handsome Stewart husband. James. He was a cultured man, a fine
warrior, possibly the most educated monarch in Europe. And verra popular with the ladies. They’re in Holyrood Palace,
Edinburgh. Margaret is in a foul mood, partly because of the worsening
relations with her younger brother, Henry, in the kingdom below:
“‘Why won’t my
brother listen to you? Instead of trying to break the Treaty of Perpetual Peace
between our two lands.’
Not liking the high colour in
his wife’s cheeks, James reached out and placed his right hand on her stomach.
‘Calm yourself, hinny. Ye know it’s no’ good for ye to get so tetchy when the
birthing chamber is no’ so far off.’
Snatching his hand away,
Margaret glared at him. ‘Stop treating me as though I’m still a child. I’ll be
twenty-three in nigh on a month.’
‘Forgive me. I was only
thinking of the bairn.’
Margaret’s voice was bitter.
‘Of course you were. Of this one and the three others lying useless beneath the
sod. Instead of in the nursery at Stirling Castle. Replacing your precious
royal bastards.’
James was becoming fearful for
his wife’s wellbeing. Unfortunately, Margaret spoke the truth; their only bairn
to have survived so far was the wee one named for him. James had hoped for a
good breeder like Margaret’s mother and maternal grandmother before her, but
she seemed to be favouring her paternal grandmother who’d produced only one son
at the tender age of thirteen, and then no more. This one was coming too soon after
the April birth, not giving her sufficient time to recover.
Somehow he had to lead his
heavily pregnant wife’s mind away from this dark place. ‘I was hoping to take
ye to see my new Lion House before ye take to your chamber.’
Normally, Margaret’s dark blue
eyes would have shone with excitement but today they were dull with exhaustion
and discontent. ‘I don’t need to see it,’ she snapped. ‘I’m already kept from
my sleep by the earth-vexing thing roaring. Not to mention the civet you’ve put
with it to rob your poor wife of any peace.’
James inwardly sighed. By
sweet Saint Ninian, five pregnancies in as many years were beginning to take
their toll on the fresh-faced lass he’d lifted from his saddle nine years ago
in the Castle courtyard below. Carrying her eagerly across the threshold to a
life of hope and promise. The presence of healthy male bastards was proof
enough that the blame for breeding sickly bairns lay with her. It made him feel
guilty this pregnancy had added an extra chin and unappealing rolls of flesh
across Margaret’s ribs. Best she didna know she looked more like a matron of
thirty-five than a maid of twenty-three. Some women, like his own sweet Janet,
strong and robust, were made to bear a man’s sons; such a woman rose from the birthing
bed with all the ease of one awaking from a good night’s rest and stretching
her arms in pleasure. For a fleeting moment, an image came to mind of a
ravishing young girl (with hair as black as a mid-winter night, streaming down
her back, past her tiny waist) who never rose from her birthing bed - before
being swiftly banished again.
* * *
He decided that fulfilling
Margaret’s wishes and treating her like an equal as she demanded would be the
best course of action. He leant back in his chair and put his arms behind his
head. ‘You’re right about your brother, Maggie. He might represent the Tudor
rose as do ye but he’s a thorn in my flesh. Perhaps I should have entertained
his toady, Wolsey, with more enthusiasm when he came up here four years ago,
sent by the old King, your father. Afforded him the same courtesy I extended to
the Earl of Surrey when ye and I were first wed. But Wolsey and I couldna see
eye to eye, I’m afraid. He wouldna listen to my complaints and thought I was
intent on pushing ahead with the “Auld Alliance”.’
‘If only Arthur hadn’t
succumbed to the sickness. He was calm where Harry was wild. He would have
listened to you. And to me.’”
A Phoenix Rising
(The House of the Red Duke, #1)
By Vivienne Brereton
“If I have anything to do with it, we Howards will live forever.”
Thomas Howard Charismatic head of one of the most powerful Houses in Tudor England. An indomitable old man approaching eighty: soldier, courtier, politician, a ‘phoenix’ rising from the ashes. After a calamitous period of disgrace, the Howards, renowned for their good looks and charm, are once more riding high at the court of Henry VIII.
Set against the backdrop of the extraordinary 1520 ‘Field of Cloth of Gold’, it is a tale of ambition, love, and intrigue, with Thomas at the centre of this intricate tapestry
Will Thomas’s bold vow be fulfilled? Danger stalks the corridors of the royal courts of Europe. Uneasy lies the head beneath a crown. Every other ruler - a fickle bedfellow…or sworn enemy.
The action takes place in England, Scotland, and France. On either side of the Narrow Sea, four young lives are interwoven, partly unaware of each other, and certainly oblivious to what Dame Fortune has in store for them.
“Nicolas de La Barre laid his lute to one side, hardly bothering to stifle a yawn of boredom. Nevertheless, he couldn’t escape the fact he’d agreed to take on a new wife….”
Explosive family secrets are concealed behind the ancient walls of castles in three lands. But…
Thomas Howard Charismatic head of one of the most powerful Houses in Tudor England. An indomitable old man approaching eighty: soldier, courtier, politician, a ‘phoenix’ rising from the ashes. After a calamitous period of disgrace, the Howards, renowned for their good looks and charm, are once more riding high at the court of Henry VIII.
Set against the backdrop of the extraordinary 1520 ‘Field of Cloth of Gold’, it is a tale of ambition, love, and intrigue, with Thomas at the centre of this intricate tapestry
Will Thomas’s bold vow be fulfilled? Danger stalks the corridors of the royal courts of Europe. Uneasy lies the head beneath a crown. Every other ruler - a fickle bedfellow…or sworn enemy.
The action takes place in England, Scotland, and France. On either side of the Narrow Sea, four young lives are interwoven, partly unaware of each other, and certainly oblivious to what Dame Fortune has in store for them.
“Nicolas de La Barre laid his lute to one side, hardly bothering to stifle a yawn of boredom. Nevertheless, he couldn’t escape the fact he’d agreed to take on a new wife….”
Explosive family secrets are concealed behind the ancient walls of castles in three lands. But…
“There are no secrets that time does not reveal.”
The Coffee Pot Book Club
★★★★★
Highly Recommended
Read the full review HERE!
Pick up your copy of
A Phoenix Rising
Vivienne Brereton
I’ve always loved the Tudor period, from a very
early age, have a degree in medieval history. I’ve lived in six different
countries in my life and soaked up the history in each one. I now live in
France which made writing about three different countries and cultures easier
for me. I’ve always worked with words wherever I’ve lived: teaching, editing,
writing.
I’m married with three sons so plenty of scope for
Nicolas and Tristan! Anne Boleyn was the only character I found slightly
elusive. All the others were so vivid, I had no problem getting into their
heads. Of the kings, James was my favourite and after all my reading I hope I
did him justice. All were brilliant men. Renaissance men, so cultured. What
would they make of ours today? Harry could easily pass for Henry’s naughty
little brother. Not sure Charles would make the grade.
Great post! I felt exactly the same about The Tudors - gobsmacked at the audacity of the changes to history but awed by the acting. JRM may not have looked the part (although he looked very well indeed) but he nailed Henry's character. Looking forward to reading your books.
ReplyDelete"PhD from the Armchair of History" I love that!
ReplyDeleteGreat post, Vivienne, and agree with Judith. Your list of historic license in the Tudors is frightening, but the acting was mesmerising. I particularly enjoyed Catherine of Aragon and Anne Boleyn's characterisations. Ordered your book and looking forward to reading.
ReplyDelete