Life in the time of Mordred
Pendragon
By Mary Anne Yarde
Jesus
wasn't betrayed by an enemy. He was betrayed by a friend. As was King Arthur. That
is how the story goes anyway.
Mordred,
the noblest of knights, betrayed his King and in doing so, he brought down a
kingdom. But that is not all. Mordred was not just a Knight of Camelot. He was of royal blood.
Mordred
was the son of Morgause - Arthur's sister -
but there is debate as to who his father was. Some say his father was
Morgauses' husband, King Lot of Orkney, which would make Gawain his brother.
While others say he was Arthur's illegitimate son, begot with his sister.
Either way, he had royal blood running in his veins. Of all the Knights in Arthur's court, Mordred
was beyond suspicion. So how did Arthur and Mordred find themselves leading
opposing armies on that fateful day in Camlann?
The
earliest known reference to the Battle of Camlann can be found in the Annales
Cambriae. The Annales of Cambriae is a chronicle that dates back to the 10th
Century. It was compelled sometime between 960 - 970AD in Dyfed, Wales. The
Annales Cambriae dates the Battle of Camlann in the year 537 AD. And this is
what it says...
"The strife of
Camlann, in which Arthur and Medraut fell."
Although they cannot be counted as a primary source, they do however draw on older stories - probably verbal - of the telling of this great battle. If you have not already noticed, the quote above says nothing about Arthur fighting Mordred at Camlann. It states that both men fell (died) at Camlann. Mordred was one of Arthur's most loyal knights, therefore it would make sense that they died together because they fought together. Which begs the question, how did Mordred become the villain of the tale?
Sir Mordred by H. J. Ford (1902) |
In
1136, Geoffrey of Monmouth penned The History of the Kings of Britain. It is
Monmouth who suggests that it was Mordred, who was left in charge of Camelot
while Arthur crossed the channel to rage war on Emperor Lucius of Rome. It is
Monmouth who states that Mordred saw this as an opportunity to take Arthur's
throne. It is Monmouth who states that Mordred not only took the kingdom but
also forced Guinevere to marry him. It is Monmouth who states that Mordred and
Arthur met at Camlann.
And
we believed him.
The
ancient Welsh texts were the first to associate Mordred with Camlann. But Monmouth's casting of Mordred as the
villain was soon accepted as the truth and others expanded upon this story
making Mordred something of an Anti-Christ - or an Anti-Arthur.
Time
passes, and the story changes. Lancelot enters the tale, and some of Mordred's
villainous activities are passed on to Lancelot - such as the affair with
Guinevere.
Thomas Malory who penned Le Morte d'Arthur sticks with tradition and casts Mordred as the villain but this time there is a slight twist to the tale. In Malory's version, Mordred believes that Arthur is dead, slain by Lancelot. Mordred, with parliaments consent, is crowned King and when he hears that Arthur is alive he does take his army to meet him. But this begs the question, why would the Knights follow Mordred instead of Arthur. Malory gives us a clue..
Thomas Malory who penned Le Morte d'Arthur sticks with tradition and casts Mordred as the villain but this time there is a slight twist to the tale. In Malory's version, Mordred believes that Arthur is dead, slain by Lancelot. Mordred, with parliaments consent, is crowned King and when he hears that Arthur is alive he does take his army to meet him. But this begs the question, why would the Knights follow Mordred instead of Arthur. Malory gives us a clue..
"...with
Arthur was none other life but war and strife, and with Sir Mordred was great
joy and bliss."
An interesting idea indeed.
In
the Lancelot-Grail Cycle, Mordred is succeeded by his sons. The sons, like
their father, had treachery running through their veins. In the older text, it
is Constantine who tracks the brothers down and kills them. In later versions,
it is Lancelot and Bors.
But
the extent of Mordred's treachery does not end there.
"...him
who, at one blow, had chest and shadow / shattered by Arthur's hand..."
(Canto XXXII)
This
quote is from Dante's Inferno. If you seek Mordred you will find him in the
lowest circle of Hell - a place set aside for traitors.
“I can't ignore what I
saw. Gaius, Mordred is destined to play a part in Arthur's death.”
BBC adaptation of Merlin 2008
- 2012
Mordred
is cast as a magically Druid boy in the BBC show Merlin (2008 - 2012). He
becomes a Knight of Camelot and has no notion of treachery until his beloved is
sentenced to death. Ironically, if Merlin had accepted Mordred as a source of
good, then Arthur would never have died - but hey, what kind of story would
that have made?
Mordred
became the villain, but maybe he was not so evil as we have been led to
believe.
Mary Anne Yarde
Born in Bath, England, Mary Anne Yarde grew up in the southwest of England, surrounded and influenced by centuries of history and mythology. Glastonbury — the fabled Isle of Avalon — was a mere fifteen-minute drive from her home, and tales of King Arthur and his knights were part of her childhood.
Mary Anne Yarde
Mary Anne Yarde is the multi award-winning author of the International Bestselling Series — The Du Lac Chronicles. Set a generation after the fall of King Arthur, The Du Lac Chronicles takes you on a journey through Dark Age Briton and Brittany, where you will meet new friends and terrifying foes. Based on legends and historical fact, The Du Lac Chronicles is a series not to be missed.
Mary loves to hear from readers, you can find her well, here! You can also find her on Twitter and Facebook
War is coming…
Read the series for FREE on
Kindle Unlimited
I always learn something new from your posts, Mary Anne.
ReplyDeleteThank you so much, Kathy!
ReplyDelete