Top
writing tips from Andrew Noakes, historical fiction editor
As an editor, no story I read is exactly
the same. But there are certain mistakes – and, conversely, things that
work well – that I often see repeating themselves. With that in mind, here are
ten top writing tips, divided into five things to embrace and five things to
avoid.
Embrace
1. A good story question. This is
rule number one. From early on, it’s important to make it clear to the reader
what your story is about and where it’s taking them. One way of approaching
this is to establish a ‘story question’ – a fundamental question that you
introduce in the first few chapters and that needs to be answered in the
resolution. Throughout all of your story’s twists and turns, the story question
then serves as the spine that holds everything together and provides a sense of
direction. In a romance, it could be ‘will the protagonist and their love
interest get together?’ In a mystery, it might be ‘who committed the murder?’ In
an action story, it might be some variation of ‘will the protagonist defeat
their enemies?’ Whatever form it takes, you can’t go wrong by giving your novel
a good story question.
2. Show and tell. The common
refrain of ‘show, don’t tell’ comes from a good place: ‘telling’ your reader
too much denies them the opportunity to peel back the layers of your story and
interpret things for themselves. But some telling is inevitable – and in
fact vital for clarity and moving things along – so the advice should really be
to show and tell. Use your ‘showing’ tools – most often action,
dialogue, and internal thought – to provide the reader with an engaging
experience, but don’t be afraid to use some good old narrative exposition when
it’s called for.
3. Historical authenticity. Accuracy
is a major concern in historical fiction. It’s vital to immerse historical
fiction readers into a world that truly feels like the past, and often the best
way to do that is to ensure things are as accurate as possible. But what
happens when accuracy isn’t practical – or when it would be alienating to the
reader? To take an obvious example, it would be accurate to write the
dialogue in your Roman novel in Latin, but it probably won’t do you any favours
with your readers! Here’s where historical authenticity comes into play.
It’s about creating an authentic sense of the past, even if it’s not one
hundred percent accurate. Language is a good example: by avoiding modern
colloquialisms, focusing on neutral words and phrases, and including some
archaic language too, you can usually create an authentic sense of historical
language without it being so accurate that it’s hard to understand. If you’re
looking for more tips on accuracy and authenticity in historical fiction, check
out my in-depth guide here.
4. Stakes. You can have all the
conflict and suspense you like, but if your plot doesn’t have stakes, it won’t
maintain the reader’s attention for long. Stakes are what make your plot matter.
And what are they exactly? They’re the consequences of the possible outcomes of
your story. What’s the worst thing that could happen if your protagonist
doesn’t achieve their story goal? And what’s the best thing that could happen
if they do? The stakes are to be found in the difference between these possible
consequences and what they will mean to your story world and characters. For
instance, in The Lord of the Rings, Frodo’s goal is to destroy the One Ring,
and the stakes are the consequences of success or failure: Middle Earth either
being saved or conquered and subjugated. They’re compelling because they have
major ramifications for the world and the characters, and because there’s a big
gulf between the two possible outcomes.
5. Setbacks. To keep your reader
interested, things need to go wrong in your plot – badly wrong. The
protagonist’s journey cannot be a smooth one, marked by success after success.
There have to be setbacks that complicate things and make it more difficult for
them to achieve their goals, and these setbacks should get progressively worse
as the novel goes on. If things just go too well, the story will feel
predictable and unexciting. So don’t be afraid to let loose and give your
characters a rough ride!
Avoid
1. An episodic structure. One problem
I often encounter is an episodic structure. This is when a story doesn’t settle
on one particular plot thread – or story question, as above – and instead tries
to include multiple plot threads, one after the other. This isn’t the same as
having side plots that relate to, and complement, a main plot that runs
throughout the story. Instead, it involves starting one main plot thread,
finishing it, starting another, finishing it, and so on until you reach the
end. This can happen if you start a story and aren’t able to develop a sense of
where it’s going, or if you find yourself struggling to sustain a plotline.
Unfortunately, it’ll usually irritate your reader, ripping them out of
plotlines just as they were starting to invest and leaving them unsure of what
the story is about and where it’s trying to take them.
2. Too much setting. Setting is
important, especially in historical fiction. It helps to immerse your reader
into the period and give them a sense of what your world looks and feels like.
However, don’t go overboard. Your task is to create an immersive sense of
your setting, not to exhaustively describe every detail. One way of approaching
it is this – when your point of view character enters an environment, what key
details can you convey that will give your reader a sense of that environment?
Perhaps, for example, in a banquet hall, it’s the smell of roasted meat, the
sound of laughter, and the dim light. If you can flesh these particular details
out a little bit, that may well be all you need. The reader’s imagination can
then take over and do the rest. What you definitely shouldn’t do is
exhaustively describe every single detail. If you do, it’ll prevent the reader
from exercising their own imagination, while leaving you with insufficient room
to actually tell the story.
3. Insufficient dramatisation. For
a story to come alive, it needs to be dramatised. That means you need two
things in particular: action and dialogue. Both of these create a sense of
immediacy, a sense of now. They dramatise your story as if it were
happening right in front of the reader. A novel can go badly wrong when it
doesn’t contain enough of either, instead relying too heavily on long sections
of narration, description, and internal thought to tell the story. These
elements are essential, of course, but they don’t have the same sense of
immediacy and dynamism that action and dialogue do, so don’t overuse them and
drown out the dramatisation.
4. Stilted dialogue. There’s
nothing quite like stilted dialogue to jar the reader out of your novel, so you
need to avoid it at all costs. That can be easier said than done, though. We
all know what stilted dialogue looks and sounds like, but it can harder to put
your finger on exactly what’s causing it. Fortunately, there are a few little
tips I can recommend: 1) Don’t shy away from contractions – they’re great for
making dialogue sound more natural, 2) Avoid making your characters constantly
repeat each other’s names when they’re talking – people don’t really do this, 3)
Be realistic about how your characters would express their emotions – people
can be very complex, subtle, and evasive when it comes to expressing how they
feel, 4) Use things like pauses, hesitations, and interruptions – these are all
natural features of speech, 5) Use body language to augment dialogue, too
(though don’t overuse it!).
5. Rushed denouement. Everyone knows
the climax of a story is important. It’s where everything comes to a head and
usually where the core issues in a story get resolved, or at least start to get
resolved. But the bit that comes next is also very important: the denouement.
This is the part where the action falls, you give the reader a chance to
breathe and take in everything that’s happened, and you tie up any loose ends.
Don’t rush through this part. If you do, your ending can feel too abrupt, and
your story incomplete.
So, there you are. Five things to embrace
and five to avoid. Of course, few rules in fiction are universal, but you can’t
go far wrong with these ones.
Andrew Noakes
Andrew Noakes is a specialist historical
fiction editor. He is founder and executive editor of The History Quill, which provides
dedicated support to historical fiction writers at every stage of the writing
process. They offer specialist historical fiction editing, coaching programmes,
and a wealth of resources tailored to the historical fiction genre. If you’re
interested in more writing tips, check out their comprehensive guide on writing
historical fiction, How
to write historical fiction in 10 steps.
No comments:
Post a Comment
See you on your next coffee break!
Take Care,
Mary Anne xxx